It is time to refer you need: Wikileaks.
avoided the issue with every intention to be something quite popular, to talk about it runs the risk of being repetitive, only three options: for, against or opposite, but I take the liberty to comment on this topic.
I read many sites that Wikileaks was an exaggeration, that the documents presented do not say anything new that I posted was not something unexpected and that it was like reading the Diary of Anne Frank, wait too and is pure disappointment (sorry you damn book lovers, I agree all the time threats).
On the other side and to be honest I am not aware that that is true, if it were we would like to thank Julian for pointing out the place Assange they should look, if false, as already stated is not it?
The great debate is information, right or not having access to it in the future it is read in history books something that is closer to the truth, to judge those who must be judged, forgiven or punished.
Information plays a double-edged sword, has an impact as the truth, which is fair you like the general public or not. On one side you can open the door to real events, it gives you weapons because information is knowledge, but whether that knowledge is good is the paradox. The good and bad is totally relative, here and in China, there is a definition or a defined line. Even Satan has its good side ... I say.
Regarding this I have noticed some peculiar aspects:
"You have to kill his reputation first, then the person will be vulnerable"
Sound familiar? ! Gladiator
Gladiator Assange is concerned. What, Nobody noticed?
Coincidence?
Coincidence is to drop a brick on your head with a serial number of the date of your birthday, that's a coincidence.
Assange The situation is Similarly, public documents is the United States does not want to know ... writing, because by this time who believe what Pearl Harbor as we have, who believes that the Twin Towers was not the work of Bush. Nobody on the planet relies on military movements made by States Together. Saying he did not intend to seize the oil from the beginning is like saying that Hitler was ready.
The whole world is usually located between two positions on the U.S.: Fear or Courage. Put in writing all the atrocities and injustices committed by the United States is nothing new, just doing it more official and due to envy or antipathy to inspire United States with respect to the whole world is logical that they endorse Assange if encouraged to identify and emphasize what everyone knows or did you know? For the moment is the same.
Enemy of my enemy is my friend.
A maxim in matters of war but not only external support.
is not surprising that the world Hackers have jumped to the defense of Assange for the simple and straightforward premise that the creed of the Hackers defend the free flow of information without making distinctions and North America has a many of these "Robin Hood" modern.
Did anyone see Die Hard 4?
The issue is simple: Prove the whole world depends on computing the point where it can go into crisis by a virus (any virus not obviously ). Everything is computerized now only takes one unhappy employee to create chaos and prove their point.
Assange Confront is not only to injure a man because we are all aware that America can and usually plays dirty in terms of achieving their ambitions respect human life regardless of who plays for it and not only lives but also foreign nationals ( and return to the Twin orres T ) Assange face is declaring war on hackers, those who give direct hits but without showing proof of this happened with the banks that broke away from their obligations, in just 24 hours will be sent an invoice. I guess that is the reason for the "diplomacy" U.S..
Trashing the reputation with something so outrageous is just a first step, a chess move, do not throw the biggest blow strong enough now just to make it immobilized, draw more attention to a violation by the curiosity aroused, the victim (in this case Assange ) gets stuck and exposed to the world, the immobilized ( in theory, of course ) and point an accusing finger even more bloody: Kill reputation.
In this case, and fortunately this maneuver only served for one thing: making more noise about Wikileaks. It was a dangerous maneuver, but effective, attention is further enhanced by the general public who watches the movements of both parties. Everyone knows that if Assange disappears somehow, in any way the responsibility of EU and all those anonymous informants that move in the internet will go on the defensive against the responsible. Is that what good? I guess the consequences would be so difficult to define.
Public Enemy taught us not only with weapons that has a certain sector of government, but in essence showed the tools that those who are fluent in binary language he is now the most feared enemy that any nation can have.
Do you think I exaggerate?, Want proof?
blogging is my hope that these issues are not as irrelevant or unknown as those away from the internet and are satisfied with using Twitter or Facebook, so the next article will ... interesting.
PD. I know he has angelic face, but his face reflects exactly what it is.
0 comments:
Post a Comment